Don’t hesitate to use Business Software to write and keep up checks!!

Don’t hesitate to use Business Software to write and keep up checks!!

Talking about online check writer – this is a cloud-based business software designed to aid businesses both large, medium and small scale businesses manage their accounts. The primary objective of the platform is to provide companies, organizations and or individuals with a fast, secure opportunity to create, and print their checks using any printer whether at home or offices. And to also issue it for various purposes which could include payments of salaries, donations, payments for goods and services, and many more uses. The Cloud-based software is a user-friendly app – which can be operated and can handle any or all check related transactions securely easily.
Onlinecheckwriter.Com features a unique operating system that makes it easy for users to operate without installing any software on their desktop, and it becomes accessible to users once the setup is complete. As earlier stated, it is fast and easy to operate, and it features quality security measures that help to keep all data contained in the checks safe, and it is designed to prevent a third party reach without authorization. 
Here are a few quality benefits of online check writer.com;
• It features an easier, safer, and faster means of designing and printing your checks from any printer, whether home or office for different purposes – ranging from payment for goods and services to employees’ salaries and many more.
• Online check writer provides a unique tool that allows you to oversee your operations, manage, document and keep tracks of your check.
• It will enable companies and organizations to print deposit slips online, and it gives easy access to submission of checks online whenever the need arose. 
• It helps reduce the stress of writing checks and minimizes the energy invested in manually writing multiple checks. Online check writer provides a sustainable, viable solution to this.
• It allows you to create generic checks via few clicks easily, and it will enable you to sign your checks with ease.
• It features unique security that prevents forged checks and allows you the chance of delegation by having total access and being able to allow a trusted third party to help you write your check while you can still limit their access and permission.
• Users have easy access to online check services without the installation of any special software. All you need is to sign up, and complete your account setup, and start designing and printing your check.
OnlineCheckWriter.Com was created in Silicon Valley, California, United States.
It has offices in both California and Texas. 

OnlineCheckWriter.Com is a division of Tyler Petroleum, a Texas based corporation with more than 200 staff. Tyler Petroleum is a Inc. 5000 2018 fastest-growing private companies in America.
OnlineCheckWriter.Com is fundamentally altering the traditional check writing landscape.

Contact
Name : OnlineCheckwriter.com
111 North Marcket St
San Jose CA 95113

Email : Support@onlinecheckwriter.com
Phone : 408 372 7707
Fax : 877 722 3376

HOW TO PREVENT FRAUD OR FAKE CHECKS

HOW TO PREVENT FRAUD OR FAKE CHECKS

Congratulations! You have won the lottery! Attached to this mail is the cashier check needed to cover your taxes and your fees. The only requirement you have to fulfil, to gain access to your winnings is to deposit the check and wire the money over to the sender to be able to cater for your taxes, fees and some other contingencies. And be assured you will be rewarded immediately your payment is confirmed.

Oops, I know you seem like you won a lottery indeed. But this is one of the many tactics fraudsters use in scamming people with checks.

What are the fake checks?

Fake checks are the counterfeit of the original checks. It is one of the major challenges the financial institutions and businesses are experiencing today. The so-called fake check scam has grown widely and easy for fraudsters because of the advancement of technology. In such a way that it is easy to deceive victims who are lying in wait for values in exchange for money.

This act of scam is possible due to counterfeiting using desktop publishing and copying to design a falsified check or create a duplicate of an original financial document, and also a chemical alteration, which includes the removal of all or some genuine information on the actual check; thereby manipulating the information to their favors.

HOW CHECKS ARE FORGED

As earlier stated, fake checks are forged versions of an original check. They look original, but they are produced without the authorization of the account holder. How is this possible? Fraudsters source for the bank account number and the bank routing number from the original checks or through series of scamming calls or emails requesting that you send your bank details for verification, claiming the verification process is from your bank. They also steal from check cashing place, having their contacts. And immediately they get the information; and they make use of some “check printing software” that enables them to design, create and print checks and even mimic the rightful owner’s signature.

Most times, when you deposit these checks, they will be cleared, which makes it look original unless the actual account owner opens a complaint within 30 days. Last year in the US, over 2 billion dollar worth fake/Forged checks were cleared (unnoticed), without the account owners opening a dispute in due times. Lots of individuals and big companies fall, victims of fake checks, most especially, those who issue a check without paying proper attention to how the checks redeemed in their bank accounts.

However, some companies and individuals employ the latest check printing software that helps cross-verify your bank information on each check issued through the software and alerts you whenever any check reaches the bank other than the one issued through the software.   

HOW TO IDENTIFY A BAD CHECK

•    Lookout for perforations in the check. If it lacks perforation, then it’s fake.

•    The absence of check numbers or having the same number

•    Take note of the font with which the customer’s name is printed, and if it doesn’t correlate with that of the address, then it’s fake.

•    Take note of possible additions to the checks – like phone numbers written by hand

•    The absence of customer and bank addresses.

•    Presence of discolorations due to the series of alterations of the check.

•    Lack of authorized signature.

FEW TIPS ON HOW TO PREVENT FRAUD OR FAKE CHECKS

•    Do not engage in a “pay to play” offers.

•    Avoid giving in to online solicitations that proposes easy money

•    Take your time to authenticate the requestor before you send or issue any check

•    Do not play the quick game of the check deposit. If someone is hurrying you to deposit a check in a limited time to be qualified for a reward. Don’t fall for it, because in most situations, such checks are fake.

•    Report any issue of suspected fraudulent actions to your bank. If a check looks unauthentic,; do not deposit it, instead contact your bank to report the situation. Bank staffs are trained experts who can help you spot fake checks without stress.

•    Protect your account using software that monitors your account activities.

However, www.onlinecheckwriter.com features software designed in such a way that, it is integrated with your bank, and help you monitor your account; thereby protects you against any fake check situation. This software enables you to keep track of cleared and unclear checks, of course you need to integrate with your bank. It allows one trusted and selected employee of the company the chance to access your account, create an issue pretty good number of checks. www.onlinecheckwriter.com is a handy tool, which can be used by both individuals and companies, whether large, medium or small. The software is the choice of all because it saves the time of checking bank accounts and manually reconciling the checks for quality verification.

Finally, the software is designed to monitor your bank account and cross-verify every checks cleared in your bank against the checks are printed and issued. It also features an alarm that alerts whenever any check is cleared other than issued at online check writer software.

You may get more information at www.onlinecheckwriter.com about the software, and how you can make use of it as a protective measure from being a victim of fake checks.

2010.01.21 Faults

00:28

'Faults thou hast'
he remembered the god saying
while he was heading
to the dust.

He recalled
life say "ceci n'est pas une pipe*":
representation -
that is life.

00:40
________________________
* The Treachery of Images

2010.01.05 (c) The Blind Man who Started to See

He was very amazed to see
that the smell of freshness was green,
that the springtime chirps were red,
that the touch of soft was white.

But blue turned he when he found space has limits.

~9.00

2010.01.05 (b) Artificial

I've tried to seem
instead of being;
to play the clown
instead of being funny;
to squeeze and unleash the tear
instead of feeling;
to...

Never a he, never himself,
but always a neutron
amongst planets of electrons and protons,
assimilated.

~9.00

2010.01.05 (a) The Atom and the Energy

Once upon a time there was
a kid
who couldn't gaze beyond the netty walls
of the atom.
His brothers had arrived at the gates
of the molecules
whilst most of their parents had met
the energy
and the soul.

~09.00

2009.12.21 vs-bcn; bcn-vs

19:43

1 In torment more, in torment less,
2 J'ascend et je descend sans cesse,
3 The newborn spat in a new nest
4 Ou les dieux veulent qu'il reste.

5 Absolute pleasures has he chased,
6 Les petites drames ne l'intéressent
7 pas. A work in square and sphere embraced,
8 Douze - Oh, déjà je le déteste!

9 In nothingness he'd like to rest.
10Il se dit "c'est burlesque".

11Un insatisfait a lui-même complaisant
12Qui change la poésie avec l'argent?

20:18

2009.11.16-17 Altrament / Other way / Otramente / Altfel / Autrement

23:00

I look and cannot see,
I speak and talk and I don't say;
seràs i no estaràs
en cap lloc
sobre el mapa del meu jo -
un camp d'afectes,
un camp on la meva inquietud pastura.

I començo des del fi,
dic "ara", després ahir,
per tant - per què?
per què no acabem al principi?
per què no quedem sols?
per què pugem?
per què hi ha aquest per què?
digué el cervell penjat
en la terra del rat-penat.

00:33

2009.11.14 Menos que mas / Más "de vez" que "en cuando"

16:00 Ahir (13 nov) fou un dia quan vaig aprendre que el valencià és: sigui la mateixa cosa que el català, sigui una part/dialecte/variant del català, si voleu *; que aquí la gent diu "Bona nit" com un procediment del silenci sepulcral; diu "Buenos días" com un comiat, a menys per uns dies; a Barcelona el matí dura fins les dues, la tarda fins les 8 [una mica sense perspectiva en comparació amb "3/4 de (no se quant)", oi?]; que no haig de preparar tant la forma de l'expressió, sinó mes el contingut; per això, no importa tant si "aquesta paraula existeix" mentre sigui compresa.

16:00 Yesterday (13th of Nov) was a day that I learnt the Valencian is: either the same thing as Catalan, or a part/dialect/variant of the Catalan, if you wish *; that here people say "Bona nit" as an anticipation of the tomb-like silence; that they say "Buenos dias" as a farewell, at least for several days; that in Barcelona the mornings end at 2 PM, the afternoons at 8 PM [a little without perspective compared to the "tres quarts de nou e.g." (which means "3/4 an hour of 9"= 8.45), huh?]; that I am not supposed to prepare so much the form of the expression, but the content; therefore, it doesn't matter a lot if "this word exists" as long as it is understood.

______________________________
*cosa que s'explica pel fet que no sé quin
gobern vol amagar la dimensió efectiva
de Catalunya.
*that can be explained by the fact I don't
know which government/other form of
power wants to hide the actual dimension
of Catalonia.

2009.08.27 AB OCCVLTO

AB OCCVLTO

Videbo quo dii me concellant?
Videbo quod sacri viderunt?
Profanus manebo at sperans,
Vel sempiterne sine divo aliquo?

Iam tempestas non venit,
Nisi aura et simulacra fugientia

~1:00 PM

2009.09.24 De Nihilo

· És el vint-i-quatre de setembre de dos mil nou, 12:00 / migdia=> ¡Festa! ¡Anem per a celebrar La Mercè! or

· Hi! It’s twelve o’ clock. “Do you know where your brain is?” (© YIM) – ‘cause I don’t.

Bon dia, Bonjour, ‘Neaţa, or however you want, because I can still find it confusing speaking even Romanian; I someday after three weeks of no contact with Romanian had the opportunity to speak it, and the weird. I should use Catalan (as it has fewer syllables, and that would be environmentally friendly after I conceive my perfectly successful book that people all over the world will be buying), French (because I have some francophone contacts at times), or maybe Romanian (because I’m supposed to know it the best, while people tell me “You should forget it!” or “I don’t want to hear foreign accent from you on Romanian!”), or maybe Spanish (well, even though la Generalitat de Catalunya pretends they are autonomous); instead, I use neither of those.

I really should enjoy the celebration of La Mercè now, but I am rooted here, ‘cause you know how a hangover is. ¡Anem a la ciutat per a celebrar! Yeah, sure, let’s sleep again.

Oui, c'est vrai, je seulement écris maintenant pour vous dire rien, o jo crec que això és només una grafomània, com a alguns els agrada dir. Est-ce que quelqu’un a quelque fois écrit sur Rien? C’est productif dans la même manière qu’un magasin donnerait aussi d’argent quand les produits seriaient vendus. C’est vrai, je vous conterai sur le Rien; comme je disais,

Jo sóc el no quan tu dius “yes”.

No passa res

si no m’entends.

Només flors negres

Sobre el cementeri de la meva men

I get to believe that I am my worst enemy.

2009.09.30 Encara em sona en la ment

QVO VADO?

(Encara em sona en la ment)

Encara em sona en la ment

la veu del meu pais

i no se on o quan hi haura

el meu futur raiz,

sobre quin terra estara

la sombra del meu ego.

Pero si se que esta vegada

ja no soc jo mateix,

ja no em conec gaire.

Qui ets? Que fas? On vas?

I vinc tambe de no se on,

d’un univers tancat.

Cada vegada em dic

‘aixo passara aviat’,

com si fos nomes el temps

un molt gran enemic,

i no jo qui s’abissa

poc a poc

mateix en se mateix.

Donc discuteixo mes d’aixo

quan trobo aquesta clau.

2009.08.17,18 Ars PROSAICA

"Poetry for prose is like a film frame for cinematography".

So this hypothesis, which is partially true, affirms that a poem is just an instant of a poet's ego. But how long can this instance be? Or its echo? Couldn't it span across more frames? Anyway, from my angle, a "standard" poem is a longer or shorter state of mind (an epic is an exception hence; or let's take The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, where there's a long series of events too)

I said "partially". Because we can either take Aeneid, or a poem with two lines. At the upper extreme, an epic national poem cannot express solely a frame of the lyrical ego's thoughts. It cannot be only a moment, a temporary feeling for the poet. On the other hand, at the lower extreme, an "I woke up/ and the Sun was smiling at me" poem is definitely a transient moment though; it only marks fugitive states of mind.

My thesis is:
Poetry is enclosed by its form (prosody, rhyme, verse etc.) and its usual sizes: there are more leftover parts of the poet's mind than he managed to express in the poem. And this limitation leads to hermeticism/esoterism.

2009.08.13 Fulfilment of the Revery

I've always seen you more attractive
Than you had been seconds before.
You've always made me recollecting
All my best times I could explore.

You never lie, you never cheat,
You gave yourself to me complete;
You filled my dreams just as you are,
You quenched my thirst sweetly bizarre.

You've always drawn me into frenzy
In moments that I hadn't hoped
To bring me into ecstasy;
I only now know how I coped.

I've always found you more attractive;
You never lie, you never cheat,
You gave yourself to me complete,
Guitar of low-pitched dreams I've had.

2:10-3:00 am

2009.07.27,31; 2009.08.02, 08 My Brain on the World Vol II: Egotism>Socialising>Relationship>Lyrism>Kitsch

How to Get from Selfishness to either Friendship or Love, or towards Lyrism or Kitsch

-De amicitia (On Friendship) - (I don't wish to rewrite Cicero's work)

Premise: Friendships = simply the sums of intersections of interests.

Maybe I'm one of the infinite ones who told that, but I'm only trying to check beliefs, as this is wanted to be an essay. Anyway, it would help for those who disregard that friendships are relationships based only on advantages to be obtained by one from each other; for those who try to over-civilise the actual meaning of true human relationships and to categorise and standardise them into books dedicated especially to good manners, do-it-like-this and don't-do-it-like-that, the Bible, ethics (a very bad-defined relative concept for me) a.s.o.
There are two sides along the barricade: extreme Christians who pretend disinterested love and disinterested friendship and the others who see any kind of human socialising as strictly depending on clear true interests. I could say there are some other people who reproach the socially/ erotically related ones with a concealed profit. And that is the ridiculous and blamable matter. Personally, I am more towards the second side. How could they doubtedly ask their selves whether his lover has an advantage of the relationship? Of course it's the sexual need which has to be satisfied, the financial safety both sometimes mixed with less and less estimated feelings. Or perhaps I'm misled not seeing that the question is on money, whether one partner wants the other's money or not. If that were the worry, then it's a matter of expressing how they conceive love's benefits in their mind. And that was only a concern that minuscule people have, as if there were two categories of humans: those who seek advantages, and those who are careless about their own lives; as if only evil minds were selfish while honourable spirits had no trajectory of life.
I once heard a teacher of logic who told us that we all are selfish, an idea that I have been quite influenced by since.

* *
*

-Ars amandi (The Art of Loving)- sung in stanzas, put on staff for millennia

At times, the abysses between us shout so heavily and loud, that some people get hurt. And our selfishness does the same and crumbles the apparent similarities that we have, making us more dissociated; finally ending up paranoids.
While we are remote universes, we tend to isolate our selves from society. Some are despairproof, some are not given a shield against life lessons by whomever force or deity you want. The latter ones might be considered they don't have enough experience.
When two abysses cross each other, one of the happiest results is lyrism, maybe all we remain with after a true relationship. From a later point in life, we notice that all those who have loved make poems. We might ask ourselves sometimes "Hmm, would grandpa create something artistic?" And we discover that this ability is rather common. It's not that popular belief about a poet who is a mad genius; they might be like that, but the most of them - trust me - are regular beings, as far as I can tell.

Kitsch vs. Art

A problem is that some people vulgarise art, reducing it to the expression of a business, like "I give something, I certainly have to receive something". Even though the equation can be reduced like this, it is actually a kitsch, like we can see out of the post 90's so-called R & B, then rap, hip hop, last, but not least - generally Balkanic jack ass manele and genres like these, where the poetry of the songs is perverted or absent; and it's no surprise they fit major audience, since they contain easy and shallow lyrics, adapted to lazy minds. How could there be art that only speaks of fame, wealth, sex, pretended respect and wisdom, foolish pride? It's mostly the same motif dressed with a more or less similar coat adapted to local (sub-)culture in order to simply be sold. And that would do for a definition.

Or there can be original artists - on the other side - that are motivated whether by money, fame, vanity, the wish to impress someone else. For instance, Tolstoi wrote for money at a certain point, some musicians compose for the sake of a beloved one (or more than one at a time, that corresponds no longer to love, you know); and it would also be a stupidity to deny that many artists start from poverty; (but that's the principle of deep art from misery - a painkiller, an eraser for those negative experiences out of the conscience).
In some other cases, people dislike showing off they are lyric or metaphysical, especially men, as they feel their selves more pragmatic.

And above these all there comes freedom: of being an introvert, an isolated freak, a so-called musician, an emo, an anonymous artist, a great poet, singer, instrument player; or just applying the principle ignorance is bliss:

Would that be a solution to an unsatisfiable knowledge?

{I don't know why I'm answering it myself or if there's going to be someone who dare [sic!] to read this. It's also just an alternative}
"Maybe" Nietzsche wasn't happier than an old country woman who has a sufficient perfect crop and her man and children close. {Well I know I have a mania to contradict many ideas and also myself, but... This also raises another giant question from a huge field of thinking: what kind of happiness are we talking about? Maybe not the religious one, but some simpler one, and if people perceive it as welfare then they don't ask their selves "hmm is my happiness what I should seek?" I'm saying this as a result of one of my recollections about echoing typical voices like "Well, if I don't have food how can I enjoy art?" which actually concretes in "You can't understand what money is" ("Tu nu stii ce-i ala ban"); though, why should we accuse those people for their way of thinking? Actually, I've been hating this type of ignorance. Instead, I'm applying the above statement in learning - and I'd apply it in teaching if it were the case - like some kind of passive tolerant acquisition of knowledge; not uninterested, but more self-planned: e.g. regarding my "efforts" of learning Catalan and Spanish I would do it like in fact children acquire them, with no teacher}

Which one do you choose?

2009.08.07 It's Present day (Satyr for "nemo")

Pass the concrete jungle (x4 whispered)

Pass the concrete jungle
If you find escape.
Seek your roots eternal,
Unless you wanna ro_______t

Let your mind decay,
Throw your thoughts away,
And on your birthday
We'll buy you a brain.

When thinking is painful,
Throw your thoughts away,
Don't mind about the city,
It buries you each day.

Let your mind decay,
Squeeze your thoughts enchained,
And on your birthday
We'll buy you a brain.

Let your body stink,
And your skin will choke;
On the Child's Day
We'll buy you a soap/ All you need's a soap.

Let your mind decay,
All your thoughts unchain
And on your birthday
We'll buy you a brain.

~ 1 AM

(possible attempt of lyrics for a song inspired by a guitar-drum-bass line made by a friend)

2009.07.24 Non-sense Longing

You'll be still for one more moment,
Fairy of the dreams I had.
We'll be true one to each other,
Let me chase you like I wish.

Widow chasing is far better than reaching their flesh, when they can sting, you know. But now I'm chasing extravaganza.
And that was the "poem" about nothing; the absolution of zero; the objectivation of the null. If there were a productive absurd/ non-sense, then let's say:

'That takes my thought to a non-sense place'
'I'm already there', said the lad,
'I am the ghoul beneath your pillow,
I am the ghoul under your bed'

Let's assume I go on with this absurdity; but to me it's like a fear of the non-sense. I'm one of those "oameni cu frica de ridicol" ("people who fear the ridicule") from an essay of Mircea Eliade. I had been wishing to make a kind of experiment with absurd ideas, like a vertigo of non-related words, just to see what it leads to, like a thought salad I had been lately concerned with. And it really represents an important question for me.

And you, haven't you been wandering around these questions? Haven't you thought of experimenting that vertigo of thoughts? Or haven't you felt that fear of the absurd the further you grew old?

2009.07.01 July Morning Erotophilosophia

-(just another) erotophilosophia-

Moto (sic!): love is more retarded than blind

again at little hours,
when the stream neurons devours

I am the blind who finds himself
In cages of deep locked damnations
Putting true love on a dusty forgot shelf
By never thought abominations.

I am too deaf for caring,
I mute the cares that start from their very root,
It's just that I cannot recall
how to care.

The blind who doesn't see the ocean from the tides,
Who seeks emotion when emotion hides,
Who sought black widows when widows cannibalize,
Who'll never ever learn their dirty prides.

I must be too me,
When I look at ye,
I must be too decayed,
A moth ever hitting the glass
Through which he knows he ain't gonna pass.

The moth just felt the glass oh so intense,
That when he hit the glass he thought he'd get a recompense,
He never learns the voltage could be harming to the wing
He'll always masochistically swing
For the volupty on love's string.

I'm overburdened with homework poetry
Cause, after all, I'm still alive!
And absolution is not a way to be,
It has to follow a decay

I got the license for the feelings firewall
Remember:'God told me I don’t deserve a licensed feelings firewall because I'm too young and I've got to learn from them'?
__________
Or not? Ain't I lying to myself? OK, that's really the end... of this chapter. When will the thrill be over? I hope this not be an original way of saying something typical.

Again, the stream. I guess the thrill is gone... for now

The thrill is gone. The creeps are in their bed.

The final question(s) for you: don't you need a philosophy of love? And haven't you felt at times the vicinity of love and death, when you feel in the same amount that the beloved one needs your love and death at the same time?

2009.07.23 My Brain on the World: Science, Religion, Culture, Art Or What Romania Borrowed Worst from the West and East

2009.07.23 My Brain on the World*: Science, Religion, Culture, Art
Or What Romania Borrowed Worst from the West and East

I can neither ignore, nor agree, or disagree to how our parents and grandparents were indoctrinated with beliefs and appearances of the Romanian socialism ¹; a few have a nostalgia on their impossible communion with the Church, but the thinkings of the most of them became pseudo-pragmatic to sceptical ones: something like I know religion isn't going to bring me my daily bread. Art or books won't either do... OR: I am a Christian, I believe in God, except I don't go to church, but how come Virgin Mary had a child without a Man to... be there in the equation? Then with a kind of pretended satisfaction: Oh, but I liked Russian novels a lot; and Eminescu, and Sadoveanu. We also studied more intensively at school ("Pe vremea noastra... se facea carte.") a.s.o. Isn't it natural to leave books when there are computers, if we don't mention the already old-fashion TV? How would a developing child quit a beautifully coloured PC game or cartoon - which are more at hand for him - and head to the bookshelf? When I say natural, I'm not at all pretending this is the normal way to raise a child, but on the contrary this is simply the logical phenomenon for some generations since the 90's. It is excusable for a child, but not for the parents too. Now I'm not in the mood for child psychology; what I'm trying to reach is that before our so-called 1989 Revolution people simply had less activities (even though the TV programme was exaggeratedly little ²), and in that era of pseudo- scientific progress we really had a more imposing series of intellectual personalities - oppressed as they were, but with greater contribution; though this very oppression led, as suffering leads, to great artistic works. I don't happen to know - to be sincere - what the great figures/ models there were (except, perhaps, the cult of the dictators); I guess it's terror that shaped people's fates, an anti-mechanism through which people formerly differentiated by capitalism had afterward been sharing poverty. I made this calque inspired by one of W. Churchill's great quotes: "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery." I invoked this socialism argument because at that times religion was in a big conflict with science. (Yes, it sounds childish; more precisely, it was the so called scientific development of our country that was supposed to nullify people's beliefs and belief's symbols because they were supposed to only follow the dictator.) The indoctrinator scientist puppets were writing brochures or books like Science and Atheism. This tells all about what they hated most: the believers (and also intellectuals). You could call me Captain Obvious, but these ideas are very expressively described in the essays from Despre lucrurile cu adevarat importante (On Really Important Issues), by Alexandru Paleologu, essays that I really liked in the past few days. The author explains for instance how a society that loses its faith is most likely to be ruled by a tyrant; and it's not about exaggerated belief led to fanaticism. Some of those essays describe how Romanian post-'89 society still suffers a handicap after over half a century with titles such as The Triumph of Oligophreny. A reflection of our current culture status can be reflected in some quotes like this:

Favorite Books
nu prea am pt ca toate care le citesc imi plac (~ I don't have so many 'cause all I read I like~ I'm not able to perfectly translate that, but it's a relative pronoun disagreement)

The book also gave me an interest in finding more information about our last king, Mihai I of Romania, one of the imposing figures that national propaganda made Romanians forget of. And that is all for now about Romanians' fake and blind transition from religion towards exact sciences. And this was the Religion - Science conflict.

Now, I start describing the conflict Science - Art.
Lately, I started creating a repulsion towards those who embrace only exact / experimental / realistic or however-you-like-to-call-them sciences; I must refer to one of my past notes: Those who are set on ground (from the sciences sphere i.e.) tend to transpose their selves into a virtual dimension, for instance in a utopia, in an imagined future. They might sometimes try to get even higher, with the help of addictions and may become junkies. Though, the higher they tend to get, the lower they sink.
Those who live in the clouds (from the humanistic sphere i.e.) tend to return to Earth, to reality. They might sometimes quit addictions, quit being junkies. It is them who, despite trying to settle with their roots deeper into the ground, they might rise on peaks never imagined before... Maybe. And this also springs from Paleologu's op. cit. that had an impact on me, making this discrepancy between realistic and humanistic people more obvious for me. He quoted stereotypes of the 90's like "With philology you couldn't get a job nowadays, the most important is electronics/ mathematics etc. (<In ziua de azi> e nevoie de electronisti. Nu mai faci nimic cu filologia.)" Partially true. He hated that "in ziua de azi" (=nowadays). After the 2000's, I guess, this became "Informatics (which means IT or computer science) is the future. You won't earn your money from philology/art etc". Also partially true.

Regarding philologists, artists or other similar people, the truth is you have to be really, but really good, if not a genius; if you are a mediocre artist, you are just another clown between clowns. You'll shake your tricks in vain if the audience throws with mud at you. Like one of my notable friends said: when you're a musician, you have to release a good song. After that, if you don't want to remain in the shadow, you have to release something remarkably better. I believe the audience needs the "clowns" too. Unless you are a national talent, the saying with the starvation warning will remain an axiom. And that is how that "partially" could be defined. Maybe I'm over-pleading for philologists, because I feel like being in front of a culture tribunal.

Regarding another branch of art, writing, I lately created a sort of repulsion towards poems too. Yes, you could freely call me ignorant, but it's a temporary belief; I think I'll be in a belief change for all of my life. The repulsion is explained in something like this: I think poetry makes ideas and feelings hide behind the stanzas and lyrics and words. During creation, the poet loses a noticeable quantity of what he/she had wanted to express.

During those times I would also hear people saying "That who knows two or three foreign languages will easily find something for a living". Oh, but I like hearing that; because I liked English; French started being more familiar to me, people would warmly then recommend me an ambassador, diplomat - or something like this - job. The truth is it only remained an enthusiasm.

These days I also personally know educated people from the realistic sphere (I don't want to sound like speaking about aliens) who present a paradox, I could say. They also belong to the majority that asks "So... Why did you choose the Faculty of Philology? You'll definitely become a teacher, am I right?" And again this same obsessive imperative, which sounds like a nightmare.

The conflict Homo universalis - Specialization states: "You must have cultura generala³" or "What will you do when someone asks you what the capital of West Samoa is?" In my first school there was a quote "It is far better to know something about everything than to know all about one thing." On the Internet I found that it is of Blaise Pascal: "Puisqu'on ne peut être universel en sachant tout ce qui se peut sur tout, il faut savoir peu de tout. Car il est bien plus beau de savoir quelque chose de tout que de savoir tout d'une chose; cette universalité est la plus belle. Si on pouvait avoir les deux, encore mieux" It intrigues me: what is this Romanian "cultura generala" that parents and mediocre/average teachers praise so much? The truth is I would like to be an expert in music, linguistics, literature, religion, philosophy, all together, but I'll never be able to. Though, I would agree to the last part: avoir les deux = to be universal and also specialist. "What if you meet someone in the street, and he/she asks you for how long Stefan cel Mare reigned?" First of all, I know his reigning years, because my first school is named after him and in the center of my native city we have his statue. Second, why should someone feel concerned about such a virtual situation?

The conflict Culture - Money or How to be a fool with diploma just for making money. "You must learn in school and graduate a faculty in order to do something for a living" our dear parents would advise us. But not for the sake of culture, but for money. Because some of them repent they didn't achieve goals like these.


____________________________________________________
*The title traces me to a short text that I had to translate in my second semester for an English language course, with an ignorant professor. It sounded like My Brain on God I guess.
1. I couldn't call it communism, as this is an utopia that was supposed to emmerge in West Europe.
2. about two hours containing: news on the Romanian Communist Party's achievements, propaganda for the dictators, and then eventually some bit of entertainment. Then, in weekends, I guess, extra hours of entertainment and a pretty good documentary, http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleenciclopedia.
3. I won't translate it because it is too rooted in Romanian culture.